← Back
Tech

xAI sues to block Minnesota’s nudify app ban

xAI is trying to stop a new Minnesota law banning 'nudify' apps. It could reshape the fight over AI and privacy.
By
xAI sues to block Minnesota’s nudify app ban
Foto: Symbolbild | reuters.com · Symbolbild (thematisch gesucht: xAI is challenging a new Minnesota law banning nudify apps) - nicht das Originalfoto der Quelle.
The essentials
  • The law bans apps that generate nonconsensual nude images and would fine developers $500,000 per use.
  • xAI says the law is an unconstitutional limit on free speech and tools for visual expression.
  • Minneapolis AG Keith Ellison called the AI nudification 'appalling' and said dignity matters more than debate.
  • The case will go to court in August 2026, when the law is set to take effect.

The summer in Minnesota has become a pivotal moment as a tech company takes on a new state law. xAI, the name now adopted by Elon Musk's former AI division, is suing to block a rule that prohibits nudify apps. These are tools that use AI to create nonconsensual intimate images.

Banning AI-generated nonconsensual imagery

Signed into law by Gov. Tim Walz in May 2026, the rule is scheduled to begin in August of that year. It targets developers who enable users to produce nonconsensual intimate images. The law imposes a $500,000 fine for each instance where such AI-generated content is created using the platform.

xAI argues the law is an unconstitutional attack on free speech, describing it as too broad and overreaching. The company claims it goes beyond protecting people’s rights and infringes on legitimate expression.

xAI says it is doing its part

xAI claims to have strong safeguards to prevent users from generating nonconsensual nude or explicit images. The company has already filed legal action against an individual in South Carolina who used Grok, its AI tool, to create such content using real photos of adults and minors.

Nonetheless, the law could force xAI to limit Grok’s image-editing features, the company says. It argues this would block users from engaging in protected expression even when their use is not against the company’s policies.

State says dignity and harm matter

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has pushed back, writing on X: 'AI nudification robs the target of their dignity and could cause them immense harm on many levels.' Gov. Walz responded with a pointed message: 'See you in court, creep.'

This case is more than a legal clash between a tech company and a state. It’s being watched as a test of how AI laws might evolve in the U.S. The decision could set precedents affecting privacy, innovation, and free speech.

“AI nudification robs the target of their dignity and could cause them immense harm on many levels.”
Should you care?

The case could determine whether states can regulate AI tools to prevent nonconsensual deepfakes. It goes to court in August 2026, when the law is set to take effect.

Based on reporting by Engadget, compiled by the Tradingbird newsroom. Published 29 Jul 2026, 13:47.
Topics: AI · Security