U.S.
The U.S. House of Representatives passed a major $1.15 trillion military spending bill in a close vote on Wednesday. The bill, which includes expanded cooperation with Israel, passed along party lines with 216 Republicans supporting it and 212 opposing it. Six Democratic lawmakers joined Republicans in backing the measure, while seven Republicans voted against it.
Republican Representative Thomas Massie, a well-known critic of the war on Iran, voiced strong concerns about the bill. He criticized the final vote for merging U.S. military technology and supply chains with Israel’s, calling it a dangerous move. Massie also warned that the bill could face significant resistance in the Senate, especially due to a provision he described as a betrayal of U.S. sovereignty. His comments highlight growing unease within the GOP about the bill’s implications.
The proposed bill would raise U.S. military spending from $900 billion to $1.5 trillion. This increase aligns with President Donald Trump’s push for expanded defense capabilities as the United States continues its war on Iran. The conflict, which began in late February, has drawn widespread public criticism and has already cost the U.S. an estimated $37 billion. The Pentagon has asked for an additional $67 billion to continue operations, citing the need for more resources to sustain the war effort.
The bill now heads to the Senate, where Democratic leaders have already signaled their opposition. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer described the bill as a "permission slip" for the war on Iran, a clear rejection of the administration’s stance. Democrats argue that the high costs are coming at a time when the Trump administration is trying to cut funding for vital social programs. With its partisan nature and inclusion of Trump’s key legislative goals, such as the SAVE America Act, the bill is likely to face strong opposition in the Senate, which could prevent it from advancing further.
The NDAA is typically seen as a "must-pass" piece of legislation each year. However, this year’s version includes several contentious measures, such as aid for Ukraine and expanded military cooperation with Israel. These provisions have added to the bill’s political complexity. As the Senate prepares to review the bill, the outcome remains uncertain, with potential implications for both U.S. military strategy and domestic policy priorities.