Eight of the world’s largest shipping associations have sent a joint letter to the United Nations, warning against the imposition of tolls in the Strait of Hormuz. The organizations argue that introducing fees for vessels traveling through the strategic waterway would breach international standards and damage the global economy. Their concerns come as reports suggest Iran and Oman are close to finalizing an agreement to jointly manage the strait.
The Strait of Hormuz serves as one of the most critical routes for global shipping, with over 20 million barrels of oil moving through the narrow channel each day. This vital artery handles a significant portion of the world’s energy supply, particularly for oil and liquefied natural gas exports from the Persian Gulf. The eight associations in the letter stress that any move to introduce tolls in this region would set a dangerous precedent, undermining the existing legal framework that ensures free passage for international vessels.
Deborah Elms, head of trade policy at Singapore-based Hinrich Foundation, highlights the potential consequences of such a fee system. She notes that disruptions in the Hormuz region often translate into sharper economic impacts in Asia, which relies heavily on Gulf energy exports. Elms points to rising costs of diesel fuel, diesel shortages, and the increased prices of fertilizers and plastics, all of which could result from higher tolls and reduced shipping efficiency.
Iran's Growing Influence Over the Waterway
This move came in response to increased tensions and the threat to regional stability. By May, Iran had established the Persian Gulf Strait Authority, a formal body tasked with managing the waterway and enforcing its new fee regime. The country’s ability to conduct attacks on commercial vessels has given it significant leverage, allowing it to dictate terms in ongoing negotiations to end the conflict.
Since the beginning of the war, numerous attacks on commercial ships have been reported in the strait, with most of these incidents attributed to Iranian forces. These attacks have raised concerns among international shipping operators and prompted calls for increased protection measures. According to the International Maritime Organization, there have been 64 confirmed incidents in the region since the conflict began, resulting in the deaths of 17 individuals. These attacks have also caused major disruptions to maritime traffic, with thousands of seafarers stranded in the area.
The ongoing instability has led to severe delays in shipping operations, with more than 6,000 seafarers still stuck in and around the strait as of late July. The International Maritime Organization and the United Nations have both acknowledged the scale of the issue and the risks it poses to global trade. Recently, a tanker traveling through the region reported hearing two explosions, underscoring the heightened danger in the area.
Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at Singapore’s S Rajaratnam School of International Studies, explained that while organizations like the UN and the IMO are deeply invested in maintaining freedom of navigation, their ability to shape the outcome of the discussions remains constrained. Thompson emphasized that the situation requires a delicate balance to prevent further escalation while ensuring that international maritime rules remain intact.
Broader Implications for Global Trade
The potential for tolls to be introduced in the Strait of Hormuz is not just a local issue; it has far-reaching implications for international trade. The letter from the shipping associations underscores that such fees would disrupt the legal framework governing straits open to international navigation. This could embolden other countries to follow suit, introducing toll systems in other critical shipping lanes. If that were to happen, container shipping and bulk cargo operations would also face higher costs, leading to greater economic uncertainty worldwide.
The signatories of the letter include major shipping organizations such as the Asian Shipowners Association, the Baltic and International Maritime Council, and the International Chamber of Shipping. These groups represent a broad cross-section of the global shipping industry and have united to voice their opposition to the proposed toll system. They emphasize that the right to navigate international straits should not be treated as a bargaining chip in political negotiations. Instead, they call for continued support for the principle of freedom of navigation, which they describe as the cornerstone of international maritime law.
Arsenio Dominguez, the head of the United Nations’ International Maritime Organization, previously stated that introducing fees in the strait would be a clear violation of international law. He warned that such a move would set a “very detrimental” precedent for global shipping, reinforcing the industry’s fears. The shipping associations argue that if Iran’s actions go unchallenged, it could encourage similar behavior from other nations, leading to a breakdown in the stability of international maritime trade.
The human cost of disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz is also significant. With more than 6,000 seafarers still stranded in the region, the humanitarian impact of the ongoing conflict is clear. The loss of life and the risk to crews navigating through a conflict zone highlight the urgent need for a resolution that prioritizes both safety and economic stability. The shipping industry’s call to the United Nations reflects a broader concern for the preservation of international norms that have underpinned global trade for decades.

