← Back
NuScale's Long Game

NuScale Revenue Dropped 99%

NuScale Power's second-quarter revenue sank 99% year-over-year, but the company's stock was up slightly, reflecting investor focus on long-term potential.
By
Hands hold a smartphone showing "NUSCALE" logo against blurred nighttime city lights.
Foto: Symbolbild | fortune.com · Symbolbild (thematisch gesucht: S&P 500 NuScales Revenue Plunged 99 Last Quarter But the Sto) - nicht das Originalfoto der Quelle.
The essentials
  • NuScale's 99% revenue drop was partly due to one-time engineering work in Romania.
  • The company has NRC-approved design and a supply chain in place.
  • A binding customer commitment remains the biggest missing piece for NuScale.

NuScale Power, a leading developer of small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs), recently released its second-quarter financial results, revealing a near-99% drop in revenue compared to the same period last year. The dramatic decline is largely due to the completion of a one-time engineering project in Romania, which had contributed $8.1 million in revenue a year ago. This quarter, NuScale reported just around $75,000 in revenue, a sharp contrast to its prior performance. The company also posted a net loss of approximately $50 million, which initially appeared alarming to many investors. However, the stock price responded positively in the following days, rising nearly 1% by the morning of the report. This reaction suggests that investors are focusing not only on quarterly earnings but also on the company's long-term strategic direction and readiness for commercial operations.

Revenue Decline Explained

Company executives, however, have made it clear that the revenue decrease should not be viewed as a red flag. The previous year’s figures were inflated due to the specific nature of the Romania project, which is now fully wrapped up. Looking forward, NuScale has pivoted its attention to preparing for the commercial deployment of its reactor technology. During a recent presentation, CEO John Hopkins spotlighted the company’s supply chain partnerships, including Paragon, which supplies critical module protection systems, and Honeywell, which supports reactor control systems. These relationships illustrate NuScale’s readiness to move from design to real-world construction. The company has worked to establish a supply chain composed of over 60 suppliers, showing it is not just a start-up in the early stages of development, but a company poised to bring its reactor technology to market.

Already holding an NRC-approved reactor design, NuScale has been working extensively to lay the groundwork for future commercial operations. However, the company remains without a solid commitment from a paying customer. One potential turning point could be the ENTRA1 project being developed in collaboration with TVA. If TVA signs a power purchase agreement (PPA) involving up to 72 NuScale modules, the company would gain a significant, binding commercial contract at scale. So far, no such agreement has been finalized, leaving investors in a state of anticipation for when NuScale will begin producing energy. The absence of a PPA is a critical gap in NuScale’s current progress, as it limits the company’s ability to move forward on construction and deployment plans.

CEO John Hopkins emphasized that NuScale is taking a deliberate, cautious approach to avoid the costly missteps that have historically plagued large-scale nuclear projects. He pointed out that the issue is not with the complexity of building nuclear energy systems but rather with rushing construction without a mature design. NuScale has invested heavily to ensure its reactor engineering is as detailed and refined as possible before deployment. This slow but methodical strategy, Hopkins argued, is a strategic advantage that sets the company apart. For much of his presentation, Hopkins focused on the importance of the supply chain and the company’s foundational work, stating that the reactor design is not just conceptually sound but also ready for real-world implementation. This deliberate progress reflects an understanding of the risks associated with large-scale nuclear construction and a commitment to mitigating those risks before moving forward.

Investor Response and Long-Term Vision

Despite posting a second-quarter net loss of about $50 million, NuScale's stock saw a modest uptick in the days following the earnings report. Investors appear to be responding to the company’s long-term vision and efforts to sidestep the challenges that have historically derailed nuclear initiatives. Still, the company’s future remains uncertain, dependent on securing a signed PPA and successfully executing its deployment plans. Without these key milestones, all of NuScale’s development work and supply chain investments remain in the preparation stage. The company is essentially in a holding pattern, waiting for the right conditions to begin construction and deployment. The stock's positive reaction suggests that investors are confident in the company’s ability to eventually secure a major contract and deliver on its long-term goals.

The path forward for NuScale is measured in years, not quarters, and patience will be essential for investors. While the company has made progress in refining its technology and building a strong supplier network, the risk remains high. If NuScale fails to deliver on its next major steps, the stock could just as easily decline rather than climb. The market will be watching closely to see whether the company can turn its engineering achievements into commercial success and deliver meaningful returns for shareholders. The company has a track record of careful, deliberate development, but its success will ultimately depend on its ability to secure a commercial contract and move forward with deployment. Until then, the company will continue to rely on its strategic approach and supply chain relationships as indicators of its potential future success.

For now, the advancements in reactor design and the growing supply chain have given investors some reassurance. Still, the real test will come when NuScale transitions from planning to active energy production. Whether this transition occurs smoothly will determine the company’s long-term viability in the nuclear energy space. The company has made it clear that it is not in a race to build the first reactor but is instead focused on building the best reactor through careful planning and execution. This philosophy may ultimately be what sets NuScale apart in a field that has seen many companies fail due to missteps and rushed decisions. However, it also means that investors must be prepared for a long-term investment horizon, as the company’s major milestones are likely years, rather than quarters, away.

Frequently asked questions

Why did NuScale Power's revenue drop 99% in Q2?

NuScale's revenue dropped 99% due to one-time engineering work in Romania from the previous year, which is now completed.

What is ENTRA1 and why is it important to NuScale?

ENTRA1 is a potential Tennessee Valley Authority project that could use up to 72 NuScale reactors. A binding power purchase agreement for it would mark a major step forward.

Does NuScale have the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's approval?

Yes, NuScale received NRC approval for its small modular reactor design in 2023.

Based on reporting by Nasdaq, compiled by the Tradingbird newsroom. Published 06 Aug 2026, 17:11.
Topics: Deals · Energy

Related

Jura's Maru-3 Well Shows 1.02MMcf/d in Pakistan · Markets ·

NY Sues Kalshi Over $36B in Illegal Gambling, Says Platform Violates State Law · Markets ·

HMRC scrutiny shakes Premier League transfer window · Markets ·

90.2% of $1.5B hack funds untraceable · Markets ·

Visa to Acquire BioCatch in $2.4 Billion Deal · Markets ·

Read this in: English · Arabiy · Deutsch · Espanol · Italiano · Portugues · Russkij · Turkce